The OACD Video Library has been developed as a resource to access recordings of past OACD programming content. Recordings are availble from a variety of programs, and are free to access.
By default, videos are listed in chronological order (newest through oldest), but you can filter results by using any combination of the search options below including keywords, program type, and year.
Watch this session to learn how to write a successful fellowship (F30, F31, and F32) application! The purpose of the NIH F-type training grant is to provide support to promising graduate and postdoctoral applicants who have the potential to become productive, independent investigators in health-related research fields relevant to the missions of participating NIH institutes. This session began with an overview of the F-award, then covered the grant submission/review process, how to prepare a successful grant, described a study section, and explained scoring and funding.
Do you enjoy translating complex research into clear, compelling narratives that influence decisions, policy, and patient care? Medical writing offers PhDs in the health sciences the opportunity to blend scientific expertise with strategic communication across industry and medical communications settings. A dynamic alumni panel of medical writers shared what a “day in the life” really looks like, how they leverage their PhD training as a competitive advantage, and their candid advice for breaking into the field.
Learn about the nuts and bolts of an NIH Grant budget straight from the SVCHS Research Administration Office! This overview will provide you with an understanding of the types of budgets, the vocabulary specific to grant budgets, what is and isn't allowable, and more. This session focused in on developing budgets that are responsive to R01 Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs) but also addressed budgeting concepts that cross all funding types.
This session guided graduate students and postdoctoral scholars in the health sciences through the process of transforming an academic CV into a targeted, effective resume. Participants learned how to translate research, clinical, teaching, and service experiences into concise, impact-driven resume content aligned with industry, nonprofit, government, and clinical research roles.
Part 1: Advance Preparation with NIH Resources- We reviewed online NIH resources that are critical to the development of a competitive RPG application: institute and center (IC) websites, NIH RePORT and RePORTER, and the Center for Scientific Review Assisted Referral Tool. We also discussed how to identify and communicate with appropriate Program Officers and Scientific Review Officers and how to identify the best study section for your application.
Part 2: Proposal Development Process- We reviewed updates to the NIH structure and priorities and their effect on the planning and development of RPG applications. We focused on strategies for developing the narrative portions of your application using data and input from resources discussed in the first session to satisfy the priorities and requirements of the funding opportunity and sponsoring institute as well as the new review framework and reviewers.
Budgeting is a key way of knowing where your money is. When using a budget, it is important to remember that one size does not fit all. In this session the Center for Financial Education and Wellness helped participants develop the budget that works best for them.
Learn critical facts about the world’s largest professional networking website, from premium profile tips to navigating connections and building even more through our vast alumni network. Get in the know on how recruiters use the tool to review candidates and get engaged for long term career success.
Research studies are typically classified as qualitative, quantitative, or a combination of the two, referred to as mixed methods research. While many studies use a single approach, mixed methods research has emerged as a valuable design that leverages the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a more comprehensive understanding. It can be used to enhance the interpretation of data, explain quantitative results with qualitative insights, or assess the broader relevance of findings from small qualitative samples.
In this webinar, participants gained an overview of mixed methods research, including its definition, rationale, philosophical foundations, and core design types. We explored how to formulate research questions, choose an appropriate mixed methods design, and consider key methodological components such as timing, integration, prioritization, and inference strategies.
Watch this informative session on the NIH’s revised approach to grant proposal evaluations, featuring the newly implemented simplified review framework. Dr. Jarlenski presented an overview of this framework, highlighting key changes and their implications for grant applicants. Following the presentation, a distinguished panel of faculty with firsthand experience in various NIH study sections shared their insights and personal experiences navigating the new review process. Attendees had the opportunity to engage in a dynamic Q&A session. Whether you are a seasoned investigator or new to the funding landscape, this session will equip you with valuable knowledge and practical tips to optimize your proposals in the evolving NIH review environment.
Many research publications are rejected due to weak or inappropriate study design and analysis plan. This course provides a structured introduction to the core principles of designing rigorous quantitative studies, helping researchers avoid common pitfalls and strengthen their work from the ground up. Developing a well-thought-out quantitative study design is critical in ensuring successful analysis and interpretation.
Participants will learn how to conceptualize a research study, develop testable hypotheses, select appropriate variables and sampling methods, and apply foundational statistical analyses. The course will also cover key methodological considerations such as bias, confounding, and the importance of scientific rigor.
Part 1: Conceptualizing a Quantitative Study
Part 2: Study Design, Bias, and Analytical Approaches
By the end of the course, participants will have a stronger foundation in designing quantitative studies that are methodologically sound and analytically robust for publication.
